I last left the blog a month ago with a problem of swelling
ankles and lower legs. Since then I went
to my primary care doctor, Dr. Vaccari, for a general exam and advice on my
swelling. She is very thorough, having
asked me 100 questions and prescribing an EKG and Ultrasound scan of my legs. I had both of these done and no problems were
shown. The end result is that Dr.
Vaccari thought the swelling might be from my other treatments and suggested we
watch to make sure the swelling doesn’t get worse. Since then the swelling has actually subsided
considerably. I am wearing mild
compression sox, am watching salt intake, and am taking magnesium. From my wonderful church nurse I borrowed a
compression machine that will reduce the swelling mechanically. In any case I foresee that the swelling will
soon disappear.
For the rest of this blog post I hope you don’t mind a
duplication of my post on Facebook:
We just returned from the oncologist. This was the follow-up after my PET scan on
the 22nd. This is the
appointment that most cancer patients dread because it is the report card on
the chemo and hormone-blocking treatments for the past 4 months. I’ll admit that I went into the examination
room with some trepidation.
Dr. Bhangoo came in and handed me the results of the PET
scan and with a smile he said, “’Looks very good.” In other words it looks like I got an A in the
test. The words on the scan report are “Stable
to slight improvement in osseous metastatic disease.” In other words the
treatment appears to have stopped the spread and even reduced the signs of
cancer in several areas.
I should explain that back at the beginning of all of
this, the doctors told me that the PET scans are unlikely to show shrinkage of
cancer because cancer in bones leaves scar tissue even when it is no longer
growing. This explains the somewhat understated
results. The bottom line is that we
appear to have kept the cancer at bay.
As Dr. Bhangoo said, “We now just have to keep it this way for the years
to come.”
The next step in a few days is to check the PSA numbers
to make sure they are down around the 0.06 that was the case the end of March.
I will also get another hormone-blocking shot that will last for another three
months. Then we another PSA and
testosterone test. The PSA will be the
marker we will continue to watch.
In the meantime I will continue to limit sugar and carb
intake, have Kathe’s wonderful smoothies every morning and continue to take
Modified Citrus Pectin, Saw Palmetto, Stinging Nettle Root, AHCC, and Broccoli
Sprouts. I also need to get back on an exercise
routine.
I am feeling very good, all things considered. Kathe and I will celebrate our good fortune tonight
by having a Brazilian dinner.
I don’t have the words to convey how thankful I am for God’s
and your support throughout this ordeal.
Les
Great news and best wishes. It sounds as though the results you got are about as good you could hope for. Everyone, however, needs to continue to think good thoughts because cancer is, after all, cancer.
ReplyDeleteIt doesn't seem as though anyone else comments here on the blog so a question would be whether you need both FB and the blog. Personally, I find blogs provide a much better (i.e. easier to use and find things) interface.
I agree that the blog isn't that well read. There have been as many as 18 reading it in the past. I am doing this as much for historical reasons as any. I have had 1100+ people reading the Facebook entries, so it is my main communication vehicle for this. BTW, my latest PSA was .03. Based on my history the lowest it has ever been was .01, so .03 may be the base. I do agree that I will have to fight to keep this at bay for the rest of my life. Thank you for the post.
ReplyDeleteWell, you just do what you can, the best you can. If you're lucky, you can keep it at bay as you say for quite some time. From my limited knowledge, you are fortunate if the only drug you are taking is the hormone suppressant. If you have to take other drugs that address the cancer directly, they often work for quite a while but can reach a point where they aren't as effective.
ReplyDelete